Discussion about this post

User's avatar
jim loving's avatar

Very good piece. I saw a reference to your writing on Developmental Politics.

I am 1/3 of the way through the book I would have written about our system had I pursued a PhD beyond my BA in Political Science 50 years ago. Much of our issues are structural, and the result of elite failure. https://americanexception.com/book/

Expand full comment
Harry La Rock's avatar

Several of the thinkers who you mention are critics of the excesses of wokism. As part of those excesses, people are denounced and charged with transgressions without any finding of facts or intent, or application of a moral basis. That’s vigilantism, and liberal discourse is a casualty. The means of this, as you say, are “scaring doubters, resisters, and critics who otherwise considered themselves ‘on the left’ into silence, submission, and/or ostrich-like denial. (One reason, obviously, why this is a bad deal is that targeted individuals may become generally alienated from progressive political currents, or at least participation in those.)

Jacobinism is one extreme approach; another would be a kind of counter-Jacobinism that whitewashes or ignores inequities that have to do with the forms and results of oppression. Those thinkers who are politically heterodox aren’t off the hook, of course, from addressing issues of systemic injustice. (Yang has a refreshing approach in that his program clearly seeks to solve the roots of division in American society.) One of the demands of the wokesters – a valid one, I think – is that anyone who has a forum has a responsibility in these times to speak to matters of social justice. Some of these matters involve racism or sexism, and the wokesters don’t want people to avoid the conversations on these, whatever their job or field may be.

Expand full comment
5 more comments...

No posts